|
Introduction
If we want to bring an end to the AIDS epidemic in Africa,
we must adopt a family approach to prevent the further spread of HIV. The
foundation of this family approach is three-fold: virginity/abstinence before
marriage, faithfulness/abstinence within marriage, and Christ-like character,
embracing self-control, commitment, and compassion, which lead to companion-ship
in the family. To achieve the necessary impact of the family approach, we have
to address HIV prevention from the cradle to the grave. This we do through early
childhood education, the education and empowerment of caregivers and guardians
of orphans and vulnerable children, the training of teachers to implement moral
values-based life skills education throughout primary and secondary education,
pre-marital counseling, and parenting education.
Defining “family” in AfricaAlready in 1969, John Mbiti,
well-known Kenyan philosopher, wrote on the stresses on the traditional African
family:
The size of the family is shrinking from the traditional
extended family concept … The authority and respect which parents enjoyed under
traditional morality and customs are being challenged … The education of
children is increasingly being passed on from parents and the community to
teachers and schools … whereas under the traditional set up both boys and girls
receive[d] preparatory education concerning marriage, sex and family life,
especially after and during their initiation rites. … [W]e are heading for
tragic social, moral and family chaos whose harvest is not far away. (Mbiti
1969)
We are now witnessing the “harvest” of the AIDS pandemic:
[T]he estimated number of maternal, paternal, and double
orphans due to AIDS in Malawi, South Africa and the United Republic of Tanzania
rose from 1.2 million in 2001 to 2.9 million in 2007. However, … all but a small
minority of orphaned children are being absorbed into kinship, community, and
other support networks. (UNAIDS 2008:47)
The family set-up in Africa was, and still is, recognized
as extended rather than nuclear. Grandparents, aunts and uncles, nephews and
nieces, as well as mother, father, and children, are all considered to be
members of one family. In the past, parents expected to be looked after by
children when they got old; there was, and still is, no welfare state. Now, in
many cases, it is the vulnerable grandparents, or aunts and uncles, looking
after their equally vulnerable orphaned grandchildren, nephews and nieces.
In a society where the primary purpose of marriage is
procreation, rather than, or even without, companionship, children are essential
to the concept of family. Yet these are the very ones being orphaned, because
the “middle” generation is dying in such large numbers. Some grandparents are
looking after as many as 12 orphans, although the average is only 2-3 in the
villages where we work. The worst-case scenario is that of child-headed
households, which is what happens after the only living relatives themselves
succumb to the stress of old age without the expected extended family support
provided in previous generations:
Arguably the epidemic’s cruelest legacy … is the orphans it is
leaving behind. … Orphaning rates above 5% worry UNICEF because they
exceed the capacity of local communities to care for parentless children.
(The Economist 29 November 2003, emphasis added)
Why a family approach?“In Africa, AIDS is a family disease” (Bartholet 1991).
Ever since the beginning of the AIDS pandemic, transmission of HIV in Africa has
been largely heterosexual (UNAIDS 2008:43). Not only that, but even more
importantly, it has frequently occurred within marriage, because
of the phenomenon of multiple concurrent partnerships (see, e.g.,
Helleringer & Kohler 2007, Halperin & Epstein 2007).
This has serious implications for mother-to-child transmission of HIV, with
almost 90% of the world’s 2 million HIV-positive children living in Sub-Saharan
Africa (UNAIDS 2008:33).
As such, AIDS is “an attack on family integrity” (cf.
Hekman, 1992:132), for four main reasons. First, HIV often infects one spouse,
followed by the other. Secondly, initially one spouse has to care almost
full-time for the other until his/her death; then later, one of the children,
usually the eldest daughter, has to care for the second spouse until his/her
death. Thirdly, even if HIV doesn’t lead to mother-to-child-transmission, the
children will sooner or later be orphaned. Fourthly, once the children are
orphaned, it becomes the responsibility of the extended family, usually the
grandparents, to care for the orphans. The following testimonies illustrate the
significance of these factors.
Testimonies:
(1) Child-headed household—Flossy Lemani
(2) Gogo Frank at Kondanani
(3) Irene Chaluluka—SAFE’s National WHY WAIT? Field
Coordinator
To highlight these factors, here are a few statistics for
Malawi:
|
Population of Malawi |
13,066,320 |
|
Population living on less than $1 per day |
65% |
|
Children under 18 years of age |
6,849.893
(52.4%) |
|
Percentage of children with stunted growth |
49% |
|
Number of orphans (½ due to AIDS) |
over
1,000,000 |
|
HIV prevalence rate |
12% |
|
New HIV infections each year |
over 96,000 |
|
HIV prevalence in pregnant women aged 15-24 |
12% |
|
AIDS-related deaths each year |
over 86,000 |
|
Life expectancy |
41 years |
|
Heterosexual transmission |
88% |
|
Mother-to-child transmission |
10% |
What is of particular concern for the prospects for
marriages is that 47% of new infections are occurring in people who are in a
single stable relationship (Shumba 2009). Furthermore, current programs and
models primarily address individual behavior modification
rather than couple-based protection strategies. Focusing on individuals’
behaviors to reduce the spread of HIV may prove inadequate in sub-Saharan
African countries, such as Malawi, where infection within marriage is becoming
increasingly common. (Anglewicz et al. Forthcoming, p. 9)
These are the reasons why it is so important to adopt a
family approach to preventing the transmission of HIV.
A family approach to preventing HIVAll SAFE’s programs consider the family as a whole:
husband, wife, children, and the extended family, particularly grandparents. In
other words, we work with people at all stages of life, from the cradle to the
grave, in the context of the family, in the communities where we work. At the
same time, we give a variety of kinds of support.
For the youngest children in a community, we provide
training for caregivers to give holistic early childhood development, care, and
education, to cater for not only the children’s immediate physical needs, but
also their long-term intellectual, psycho-social, emotional, and spiritual
development. Part of the training includes attention to nutrition, to ensure
sound brain development which will permit the children to reach their full
potential. Already, after only one year of such early children education,
children from our first preschool were doing significantly better than their
counterparts from other preschools or no preschool, by Grade 3.
If the young children are not educated properly at the
preschool level, they will never break out of the cycle of poverty which, for
many urban-based children, is resulting from their being orphaned by AIDS and
their subsequent return to the village to be cared for by their grandparents or
other relatives. A major contributing factor to dropout in later years is
absence of appropriate preschool facilities.
An important aspect of the training which we have recently
added is that of grieving counseling, in which we have trained grandparents to
handle not only their own grieving, but also that of the orphans in their care.
This is significant for psycho-social and emotional development, which will
allow the children to overcome their grief and move on.
As the children grow, we have set up a network of support
for them to be assisted through primary and secondary education. Even though
primary education is free, most schools require children to wear school
uniforms, which we provide for the poorest families. Later, we help those young
people who are selected to attend secondary school, by paying school fees, and
supporting them in other ways. For example, Flossy (the orphan mentioned
earlier) asked for a kerosene lamp and kerosene to enable her to study in the
evenings, after dark, so that she can do better in secondary school.
While the students are in primary and secondary school, we
try to ensure that they are taught our character development and life skills
curriculum, WHY WAIT?, so that they master the skills they need to make moral
choices, after critically and/or creatively reasoning about a particular
problem. Our main focus is on helping them develop the necessary self-control to
act on their moral decisions, but the foundation is a healthy awareness and
knowledge of moral values which underpin a healthy self-esteem. In schools which
have adopted the WHY WAIT? curriculum wholeheartedly, dramatic changes have been
observed. Just one example will suffice. At Ndirande Primary School in a
high-density area of Blantyre, the main commercial center of the country, with
an enrolment of over 7,000 students, the dropout rate fell from 7.5% to 0.0001%
within three years. Even more notable was the drop in teen pregnancies: in 1998,
just before the program was introduced, there were over 130 pregnancies; in
1999, there were only 20+ pregnancies; from 2000, there have not been more than
2 pregnancies in any one year.
Because the vast majority of the students are vulnerable as
a result of being infected or affected by HIV&AIDS, we also devote some time to
teaching them parenting skills. We are fully aware that many of them will not
have seen modeled either the life skills or the parenting skills they will need
to lead a stable life once they have identified the right marriage partner. If
they do not acquire the necessary life skills and parenting skills, they are in
grave danger of repeating the mistakes of their parents that led to themselves
being orphaned. If that happens, the poverty cycle will never be broken.
Apart from the support we give the grandparents for their
grandchildren, we also provide agricultural inputs, including maize seed and
fertilizer. These have resulted in the grandparents bringing back to their local
preschools food for their grandchildren’s feeding program, from their good
harvests. We are currently planning to give training in both Farming God’s Way
and natural medicine (through anamed—Action for Natural Medicine). Our aim is to
increase the chances of food security and long-term sustainability, and reduce
dependence on artificial fertilizer. In addition, at the monthly “Gogo
Grandmother” meetings, we provide instruction in nutrition, to ensure that the
orphans are being appropriately nourished.
The values underpinning the family approachSAFE’s mission is to encourage both youth and families to
implement the “A, B, C” of HIV/AIDS prevention, so that:
Abstinence—Affirms both the
dignity and responsibility of human sexuality.
Be faithful—Builds strong
supportive families which will encourage both A and B.
In order to do this,
C becomes Christ-like Character,
demonstrating Control, Commitment, and Compassion,
thus, being able to enjoy true Companionship.
For families to be stable and stay safe, we help young
people develop Christ-like character so that they can exercise the self-control
to maintain their virginity by abstaining from sexual intercourse before
marriage. This self-control is essential for them to be faithful to their future
spouse before marriage, and subsequently to be faithful within marriage.
However, exercising self-control is not easy when one’s basic human needs are
not met. It is particularly important, for example, to help orphaned teenage
girls to stay away from prostitution, or teenage boys from drugs leading to
crime, which are merely short-term solutions to poverty, often leading to even
greater poverty—if for example the girl gets pregnant and/or is infected with
HIV, and has to abandon school. Thus we seek ways of fulfilling the basic needs
of all the people in the communities where we work.
In this way, the communities begin to recognize their own
and each other’s human dignity. Many people are totally unaware of their
personal dignity and worth as human beings created in God’s image, both male and
female, and it is wonderful to see their eyes lighting up once they realize that
they are special. Arising from this new-found awareness of their dignity is an
improvement in their interpersonal relationships. One cannot respect other
people if one does not respect oneself.
As a result, the family comes to reflect the image of
God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The parents demonstrate their love for their
children by providing them with the necessary food, shelter, clothing, etc., and
protecting them from dangers, in the same way as God has loved us. Over time,
the parents teach their children, most effectively by simple example, that human
dignity calls for responsibility. The children learn what it means to have a
work ethic, and also how to protect God’s creation by conserving the environment
and other resources.
As they grow up, the children learn moral values by
observing their parents modeling them. Moreover, they learn that love is a
choice, as they see their parents choosing to continue to love each other on a
daily basis, throughout the ups and downs of family life. At all times, the
parents hopefully demonstrate servant leadership, rather than an autocratic
parenting style, so that when the children make a mistake, they punish them
appropriately, but particularly they help them to recognize the mistake, and
change their behavior, accepting their parents’ and God’s forgiveness.
This recognition that, as Christians, we can start again
when we have sinned, repented, and sought forgiveness helps young people develop
a healthy conscience, which distinguishes between right and wrong behaviors,
with the former improving self-esteem and the latter leading to feelings of
guilt. It also helps break the silence resulting from shame and the fear of
stigma surrounding the HIV epidemic. When we recognize that “all have sinned and
fall short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23), so that we are not alone in
having made mistakes, we are more willing to acknowledge these sins, not only in
ourselves (which might otherwise make us ashamed) but also in others (which
might otherwise lead us to stigmatize them).
The young people also learn that their mind matters. They
can CHOOSE between good and bad behaviors, and even engaging in sexual
intercourse before marriage is a choice, except in the case of rape. They even
learn about their own sexuality through their mind. Although different cultures
express themselves in slightly different ways, for example, with different kinds
of initiation ceremonies, ultimately the core human values which we derived from
God are universal.
Finally, the people we work with develop an understanding
of how to respond to the problems that confront them. Instead of reactively
sitting back and waiting for others to help them, they proactively seek answers,
not just at the family level but even at the community level. For example, the
pastor in one community where we work has mobilized the community as a whole to
work in community vegetable gardens so that all the families are helped. He has
even taken orphans into his own home to bring them up with Christian values.
Differences between this prevention approach and othersMost prevention approaches tend to address only technical
problems, as Campell and Williams (1990:21) point out:
The practice of having multiple sexual partners is the main
causal factor in the transmission of HIV in Africa. Promoting the use of condoms
does not address this issue. It advocates a technical solution to a problem
which can be addressed only through fundamental changes in social attitudes,
values and behavior.
Rushing (1995:235) goes further:
In the final analysis, whether the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Africa
slows down will depend on millions of people changing their behavior. And since
behavior is anchored in cultural norms, social institutions, and the structure
of social rewards, change will be hard for health care professionals to bring
about. … African programs must be adapted to the traditional social practices
and culture of Africa.
Even the current promotion of male circumcision is a
technical solution. Although there is mounting evidence that male circumcision
before HIV infection reduces quite substantially the danger of
becoming infected, and if infected, reduces quite substantially
the danger of transmission (Halperin & Bailey 1999), like the promotion of
condoms, it does not entail behavior change:
In particular, behavior will have to change among men, who
have a vital role to play in overcoming the traditional attitudes and practices
that have contributed so much to the spread of AIDS in Africa. (UNICEF 2002:7)
Nonetheless, almost 30 years later most approaches continue
to treat HIV&AIDS as almost exclusively a medical problem, as Jungar and Oinas
(2004:109) point out: “The tragic [sic] of the medical construction of
‘African AIDS’ is that it hampers the implementations of effective
prevention programs.” This is because most approaches fail to seriously consider
the implications of the fact that AIDS is a behaviorally transmitted disease.
They ignore the broader social, psychological, economic, and especially
spiritual impact, not just on the individual person living with HIV but on every
member of his/her nuclear AND extended family.
Even most life skills programs maintain too narrow an
understanding of how to achieve behavior change. By contrast, in our approach,
we maintain a balance between the knowledge, desire, and skills, for each
component, and at each stage of learning, from early childhood through primary
and secondary education to mentoring the grandparents looking after orphans,
thus promoting a healthy and stable family life. Below is the framework (taken
from Focus on the Family 1999):

Young people who learn life skills in this integrated way,
rather than as a large number of separate skills, each perceived to be equally
important but unrelated to others, will be more likely to make right choices of
marriage partner, and also subsequently bring up their children with similar
moral values, within stable families.
ConclusionUltimately, we will not be able to stem the spread of HIV
unless and until we adopt a family approach, which takes account of all the
strains and stresses on families infected and affected by AIDS. This is how SAFE
has been slowly developing its programs, since 1993, and is continuing to
develop ways of improving the quality of life of communities absorbing the huge
number of orphans. SAFE works with the grandparents looking after very young
orphans; it trains caregivers to give Biblically holistic early childhood
education at Community-Based Child Care Centers; it provides Christian
values-based life skills education in primary and secondary schools; it provides
training in parenting skills and nutrition. All these activities SAFE engages in
from a Biblical worldview perspective.
Although Anglewicz et al. (forthcoming, p. 9) come
close to the solution, when they state:
Overall, our findings highlight … the necessity of considering
HIV risk from the couple, rather than the individual, perspective when planning
HIV interventions and policies in sub-Saharan African countries with generalized
epidemics.
They and other researchers, as well as governments, NGOs,
etc., all need to recognize that the answer in sub-Saharan Africa is not just a
couple-based approach but a whole family approach.
References:Anglewicz, Philip, Simona Bignami-Van Assche, Shelley
Clark, & James Mkandawire. HIV risks among currently married couples in rural
Malawi: What do spouses know about each other. Forthcoming in AIDS and
Behavior
Bartholet, Jeffrey. 1991. AIDS: Africa’s family disease.
Newsweek 16 September:42-43.
Campbell, Ian D & Glen Williams. 1990. AIDS management:
An integrated approach London: ActionAid.
Focus on the Family. 1999. No apologies: The truth about
life, love, and sex.
Halperin, DT & RC Bailey. 1999. Male circumcision and HIV
infection: 10 years and counting. Lancet 354:1813-1815.
Halperin, DT & H Epstein. 2007. Why is HIV prevalence so
severe in Southern Africa? The role of multiple concurrent partnerships and lack
of male circumcision. Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine,
March:19-25.
Hekman, Randall J. 1992. The attack on the family: A
response. In William Bentley Ball, ed., In search of a national morality: A
manifesto for evangelicals and catholics. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House
and San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, pp. 131-143.
Helleringer, S & H Kohler. 2007. Sexual Network Structure
and the Spread of HIV in Africa: Evidence from Likoma Island, Malawi. AIDS,
November 12, 21(17):2323-2332.
Hunter, Susan. 2003. Who cares? AIDS in Africa. New
York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jackson, Helen. 2002. AIDS Africa¾Continent
in crisis. Harare, Zimbabwe: SafAIDS.
Jungar, Katarina & Elina Oinas. 2004. Preventing HIV?
Medical discourses and invisible women. In Signe Arnfred, ed., Re-thinking
sexualities in Africa. Uppsala, Sweden: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet, pp.
97-111.
Mbiti, John. 1969. African religions and philosophy.
London: Heinemann.
Rushing, William A. 1995. The AIDS epidemic: Social
dimensions of an infectious disease. Boulder, CO: Westview.
UNAIDS. 2008. 2008 Report on the global AIDS epidemic.
Geneva: UNAIDS.
UNICEF. 2002. Eastern and Southern Africa Regional
Educational Newsletter, 2, 1, March.
|