Home | Purpose WCF6 WCF5 WCF4 | WCF3 | WCF2 | WCF1 | Regional | People | Family Update | Newsletter | Press | Search | DONATE | THC 

 

 

 

Send

Conveners | Declaration | Program | Speakers | SwanSearch Speeches | Presidential Letter | Congressional Letter | Photos

 

 

 

 

THE MEDIA'S RESPONSIBILITY TOWARDS THE FAMILY AND SOCIETY

 

 

Dr. Ted Baehr

  BIO

Producer, writer, director, radio personality, and scholar, serves as publisher of MovieGuide based on biblical values. He has eighteen years of research in evaluating the impact of the media on both children and adults. He holds degrees in law and theology. His recent books include: The Media-Wise Family and Hollywood’s Reel of Fortune: A Winning Strategy to Redeem the Entertainment Industry.

Précis: The motto of this conference is “it is time to orchestrate a common strategy to affirm and defend the natural family.” One prong of this strategy must focus on the mass media of entertainment, which has promoted an anti-family agenda since the demise of the golden age of Hollywood in 1966. Since 1966, the mass media of entertainment has abandoned responsibly for license. To restore sense and sensibility, we must redeem the values of the mass media of entertainment according to biblical principles: by influencing media executives to adopt higher standards imbued with Christian and traditional family values; and, by informing and equipping moral people in America and around the world, especially parents, families and Christians, to make wise media choices based on the biblical worldview. Making wise choices and protecting children from harm from the mass media involves understanding: 1) the problem; 2) the susceptibility of children at each stage of cognitive development; 3) the mass media of entertainment; 4) your worldview and values; and, 4) media wisdom. 

MEDIA-WISE  (Show 2004 Gala promotional video)

Scripture: "But if a widow has children or grandchildren, these should learn first of all to put their religion into practice by caring for their own family and so repaying their parents and grandparents, for this is pleasing to God." (1 Timothy 5:4 (NIV))

Morals make cents:

On one visit to the head of a major movie studio, he complained to me that the box office was down. He asked me what I thought the problem was, and I replied, "Your customers have been killed off. Teenagers are the biggest movie going group, and there are less of them now than ever. 32 million or more children have been killed in the womb. Think of the box office you have lost as a result." Suddenly, he became concerned about the loss of his audience.

In the beginning:

To paraphrase Charles Dickens' immortal opening in the TALE OF TWO CITIES over one hundred years ago: It is the best of times, it is the worst of times. Today, I am going to tell you some bad news and some good news. They are not mutually contradictory. Rather, like the nature of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, who was both fully man and fully God, it is a both/and not an either/or situation.

The good news is, of course, THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST. However, it is also that when we started Christian Film & Television Commission™ ministry's MOVIEGUIDE® in 1985, there was only one movie with positive Christian content; in 2003, there were 116 or 42 percent of the movies released. When we started there were only six movies aimed at families; in 2003, there were over 40 percent. When we started, more than 80 percent of the movies released theatrically were R-rated; now, less than 45 percent are R-rated each year. Moreover, there are nine new positive big budget movies about Jesus Christ being released and produced over the next few years, including: THE GOSPEL OF JOHN, THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST, THE GOD/MAN, THE LAMB, THE GREATEST KING, THE ALPHA AND OMEGA, and THE GOSPEL OF MARK. The chairman of a major studio recently told me at lunch that he attributed these shifts directly to our influence and our economic benchmarking of the entertainment industry. This was the same studio head who years before was concerned about the falling box office.

But, I will tell you more about that later.

The bad news is that families are failing and a significant contributing influence to that failure is the mass media of entertainment, which has been promoting an anti-family agenda for many years and aggravating the lust of the eyes and the lust of the flesh. For too many years that message of Hollywood has been:

  •  God does not exist.

  •  The “god” who exists is not personal.

  • “god” is irrelevant.

  •  Romantic love, sex, money, and power are the highest goals of life.

  •  Premarital and extramarital sex is normal, frequent, and OK - and is without consequences.

  •  Rebellion and disrespect are normal, frequent, and OK.

  •  Crude language and behavior are normal, frequent, and OK.

  •  Smoking, drinking, and recreational drug use are normal, frequent, and OK.

  • Romantic love is real love.

  • Hollywood “stars” are to be imitated and idolized.

  • Hollywood “stars” and rock musicians have the answers.

  • Youth, beauty, and money determine the value of a life.

  •  Christians are kooks.

  •  Conservatives are kooks.

And, many in the society have bought the anti-family lies of the mass media of entertainment.

Furthermore, the media not only sets the cultural agenda and defines the norm, but it also influences behavior. There have been over 10,000 studies on the influence of the media. In 1972, the US Surgeon Generals Office reported on 3,000 studies on the influence of television. In 1978, the National Institute of Mental Health reported on 10,000 studies. In 1991, the American Psychiatric Association said that the evidence that movies and television influenced children to commit violence was irrefutable. The New York Times agreed and said that this was not a free speech issue, but a public policy issue. In 2000, four major medical associations in the USA said that there was a causal connection between violence in the mass media of entertainment.

However, the most powerful statement of the influence of the mass media of entertainment came from Leslie Moonves, the president of CBS Television when he testified before Congress after the Columbine killings. Mr. Moonves said, "If anyone thinks that the media didn't have anything to do with this, they're an idiot."

In this regard, research has shown that different people are susceptible to different media influences. Seven to eleven percent of the children are susceptible to the violence in the mass media of entertainment, while thirty-one percent want to copy the sex and over sixty percent are influenced by drugs and alcohol.

Furthermore, as the Bible notes, prosperity proceeds judgment. God wants to prosper us, but when He does, He says that we turn from him and forget the homeless, the needy and the outcast. Then, judgment starts, and we stew in the juice of our own sin.

When good men do nothing

During the Golden Age of Hollywood, the mass media of entertainment used to be pro-family and pro-morality tale. During those years, the church was the primary influence behind the scenes in the entertainment industry and helped the entertainment industry adhere to the Motion Picture Code. Then, the church shut down the Protestant Film Office in 1966 and the Catholic Film Office moved out of Hollywood.  Within three years, movies went from: THE GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD to the first X-rated movie where the pastor was the villain who led the star into homosexuality -- MIDNIGHT COWBOY; THE SOUND OF MUSIC to the first sex and Satanism movie -- ROSEMARY'S BABY; and, from MARY POPPINS to the first ultra violent movies -- BONNNIE AND CLYDE and THE WILD BUNCH. 

All this proves Edmund Burke's dictum that Evil will triumph when good men do nothing. The entertainment industry in the process moved from liberty guided by responsibility, to license guided by anything goes. And, regrettably, having abandoned the Motion Picture Code, Hollywood's switched to ratings in 1969 which are a self-serving marketing tool. In fact, the MPAA rating system is the ultimate marketing ploy to children.

The ratings sham

On October 5, 1990, the first NC-17 film, HENRY AND JUNE, was released in theaters across the country by the infamous MCA-Universal, who distributed THE LAST TEMPTATION OF CHRIST. Actually, HENRY AND JUNE is an X-rated film featuring a menage-a-trois (a man, his wife and their girlfriend), but the Motion Picture Association of America invented the new category of NC-17 to deceive the public so that the major movie companies, who pay the bills at the MPAA, can move into the lucrative X-rated market without the stigma of the X rating.

What this means for the average American is that obscene, X-rated movies, which were formerly restricted to so-called art houses and porno theaters and could not advertise on television, radio or in the local newspaper, are now in the local mall multiplex theaters attracting an audience with deceptive advertisements in the local newspaper and on the local TV and radio stations. Since this will generate revenue for all involved, except the poor person who pays hard earned money to see this filth, the newspapers, TV stations, radio stations and other media are overjoyed with this repackaged smut peddling and have joined the bandwagon supporting the new rating.

Movies are not art

They are entertainment, which employ artistic and communicative elements. The entertainment industry is a $30 billion a year business which appeals to people’s visceral emotions to separate them from their hard earned dollars. Much of that money comes from R-rated films, what the movie industry calls “horny boy” movies, because they are targeted at the hormones of teenage boys who drag their dates along so they can be desensitized to promiscuous sex so they will consent to fornicate afterwards in some secluded spot.

Art is not beyond good and evil. It is subject to judgment on moral and ethical grounds. For example:

The Holocaust Museum in Israel displays Nazi art, which denigrates Jews and inflamed the German people against the Jews. This bigoted art is evil and deserves the censure which society has leveled against it.

Instructing the most powerful person in Hollywood

One key to rebuilding the family is to rebuild the mass media of entertainment by teaching them responsibility and wisdom. The Christian Film & Television Commission™ ministry has had great success in this regard by influencing the most powerful men in the entertainment industry who are the teenagers who go to movies and by helping Hollywood understand that good movies do better at the box office.

To teach the most powerful person in the entertainment industry, the teenager to be media wise so that they will chose the good and reject the bad, is a five-step process.

Many Christian parents are concerned about the influence of media violence on their children, but many of those who are concerned don’t know what to do about the problem. The good news is that there are effective ways to teach your children to be media-wise.

As director of the TV Center at City University of New York, I helped develop some of the first media literacy courses in the late 1970s. Since then, years of research have produced a very clear understanding of how to teach media literacy.

There are five pillars of media wisdom.

The first is understanding the influence of the media, which may be titled, “breaking the bonds of denial.”

As Dale Kunkel, professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, points out, after thousands of intensive studies in this area, only one significant researcher still denies the influence of the media, and that researcher last did real research in this area in the mid-1980s. In the wake of the Columbine High School massacre, CBS president Leslie Moonves put it quite bluntly, “Anyone who thinks the media has nothing to do with this is an idiot” (Associated Press, 05/19/99). Thus, the American Psychological Association's report on media violence concluded, “There is absolutely no doubt that those who are heavy viewers of violence demonstrate increased acceptance of aggressive attitudes and increased aggressive behavior.”

Children on killing sprees… Increased risky behavior by children…. Children at war with their parents….  Daily, newspapers proclaim the greatest threat facing families – the millions of children (who are a reward from the Lord according to Psalm 127:3) who were not raised in the fear and admonition of the Lord, or on OZZIE AND HARRIET or LEAVE IT TO BEAVER, but on NATURAL BORN KILLERS, HALLOWEEN and SCREAM.

The first signs of the moral character of many of the generation Y who were raised on and by the mass media of entertainment may be the killings conducted over the last few years by the adolescents and pre-adolescents in the USA. According to exhaustive research, the violent media of entertainment has set the moral agenda for the future.

To paraphrase Theodore Roosevelt: If you educate a man’s mind and not his heart, you will have an educated barbarian.

This is not to stay that all contemporary children are educated barbarians. Studies show that most who watch the media merely become desensitized. A significant minority become frightened and paranoid. Regrettably, 7 to 11 percent of the adults and up to 31 percent of the teenagers say they want to copy what they see.

In The Los Angeles Times reports that the Hollywood-based entertainment industry looks forward to the new wave of teenagers because the Hollywood executives have found that teenagers are most easily attracted to sex and violence and immoral behavior in movies and on television.

With the greater numbers comes greater influence. Teenagers are on their way to becoming America's cultural arbiters. Since the success of SCREAM, the entertainment industry has put dozens of teen horror projects in the pipeline. Networks are adding teen programs with plenty of sexual activity based on the popularity of programs such as DAWSON’S CREEK, BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER and PARTY OF FIVE.

Today's teenagers may be even more of a pop culture steamroller than their parents were. There will be as many of them as there were teenage boomers during the 1960s. They see far more movies than any other demographic group. While only 16% of the population, they buy 25% of the movie tickets. Raised by cable TV, they want constant stimulation.

American Teenagers:

  • Teenagers spend $122 billion of their own and their parents' money each year, not including their influence on family purchases.

  • In the last three months, 72% of teenagers age 12-19 have gone to the movies.

  • Movie going is considered an "in" activity among 92% of teenagers, more than playing sports (89%), using the Internet (90%) or going to the beach (76%).

  • In the last three months, 71% of teens purchased at least one full-length CD, 33% bought a CD single and 35% bought a full-length cassette.

  • Movie going peaks in the teenage years. People age 12-20 make up 16% of the population, but buy 26% of movie tickets.

  • Nearly 90% of 12- to 20-year-olds reported going to the movies "frequently" or "occasionally." Only 3%-4% said they never go to the movies.

Los Angeles Times, Calendar 06/09/98 citing: Teenage Research Unlimited; Motion Picture Assn. of America; and, Nielsen Media Research.

Of course, media is not the whole problem, but only one part of the equation that could be summed up with the sage biblical injunction, “Do not be misled: 'Bad company corrupts good character” (1 Corinthians 15:33, NIV). This is the message of the Surgeon General's Report on youth violence, which showed that watching media violence causes violence among children  – bad company corrupts good character, whether that bad company is gangs, peer pressure or violent television programs.

Breaking the bonds of denial also means noting that there is a lot of good entertainment out there, which we honor every March at the Annual MOVIEGUIDE® Faith & Values Awards Gala and Report to Hollywood in Hollywood. In fact, because of our efforts, the number of movies with Christian content has more than doubled in the last five years.

The second step in media wisdom is understanding the susceptibility of children at each stage of cognitive development. Not only do children see the media differently at each stage of development, but also different children are susceptible to different stimuli. As the research of the National Institute of Mental Health showed many years ago, some children want to copy media violence, some are susceptible to other media influences, some become afraid, and many just become desensitized. Just like an alcoholic would be inordinately tempted by a beer commercial, so the propensity for susceptibility plays an important part in what kind of media will influence your child at his or her specific stage of development.

Children go through different stages of cognitive development. Although there are many factors that are common to all ages of development, there are also unique distinctions.

Children often see the world and the media quite differently than adults.  Parents generally look at television programs semantically in terms of the meaning of what is said or what is happening.  Children see syntactically in terms of the action and special effects in the program. For instance, with regard to music, a mother will say to her child, "Did you hear the lyrics in that awful song?" And, the child will respond, "Ah Mom, I don't listen to the words. Did you hear the rhythm and the beat?"

Cognitive development is often directly impacted by the mass media, especially television. It is important to understand that cognition is not thinking; rather, thinking is part of cognition, and cognition itself is the process of knowing, which philosophers and theologians call epistemology. Cognitive development is similar to building a house step-by-step from a blueprint, or to adding colors to our mental palette, or to installing an operating system in a computer so that the computer can then do all the tasks, or thinking, that you direct it to do.

Each of these tasks must be done correctly and in the right order or the result will be a disaster. The human operating system develops over many years in a series of stages. Each stage has unique characteristics and each stage must develop properly.

For instance, once when I was teaching at an Ivy League graduate school, a woman in the audience shrieked because her toddler had picked up a sharp instrument and was about to do what every toddler does with whatever they pick up, which is put it in his mouth. After quickly taking the sharp tool away from her toddler, the mother started to lecture him.

After the wave of concern in the room died down, I noted that toddlers are in the sensation stage of cognitive development, which merely means that they learn through their senses, and that taking the object away from her child was the right thing to do, but lecturing the toddler would have no effect because the toddler was not at that stage of development where he could understand the logic of her arguments. Thus, I noted toddlers have to be protected by their parents and cannot be expected to make wise decisions when they are presented with dangerous situations.

When you pass from one stage of development to another, you tend to forget what the previous stage was like. Thus, when my six-year-old boy, Robby, was frightened by a thunderstorm, my eleven-year-old, Peirce, tried to get his younger brother to be quiet by telling him to "Shut up." When this compassionate request didn't work, my oldest told Robby that the reason for the thunderstorm was that God was angry with him. Of course, this only aggravated Robby’s fears.  I pointed out to Peirce that Robby was affected by the storm very differently than he was because Robby was in the imagination stage of development wherein his imagination was predominant, and he was trying to sort out the difference between fact and fiction.

I reminded Peirce about the time he had a friend stay over night when he was 9-years-old, and the friend had nightmares all night long. The next morning, I asked the young boy what was bothering him, and he said that his father had taken him to see the R-rated movie TOTAL RECALL, an extremely violent movie. The boy said that he didn't like the scene where Arnold Schwarzenegger shoots Sharon Stone, who is posing as his wife, and says, "Consider that a divorce."

When I called his father to tell him of the fears expressed by his son, he replied that his son was a man and that he took his son to a lot of R-rated movies. I noted that his son was in the imagination stage of cognitive development and was incapable of dealing with the violence in many R-rated movies. I said that taking him to see these films was like putting him on the front line of psychological and spiritual warfare just like sending children into battle without adequate training and before they are big enough to carry their weapons. After three months, the father called to say that I was right and that he could see that his son was disturbed by the movies to which he had taken him.

Perhaps Lt. Col. David Grossman has done the most to help us understand the ability of the mass media of entertainment to influence younger media consumers to violence.

Lt. Col. Grossman spent almost a quarter of a century as an army psychologist, learning and studying how to enable people to kill. When he investigated the killings by the 15 pre-adolescents and adolescents last year, he found that there was a significant correlation between how the media had trained them to kill, and how the army trains its recruits to kill.

Lt. Col. Grossman points out that killing is unnatural. Killing requires training because there is a built-in aversion to killing one's own kind. Only sociopaths – who by definition don't have that resistance – lack this innate violence immune system.

Thus, children don't naturally kill. It is a learned skill, and they learn it from violence in the home and, most pervasively, from violence as entertainment in television, the movies, and interactive video games.

Understanding how the military increases the killing rate of soldiers in combat is instructive, Lt. Col. Grossman notes, because our culture today is doing the same thing to our children. The training methods militaries use are desensitization, classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and role modeling.

Lt. Col. Grossman points out that brutalization and desensitization are what happens at boot camp. From the moment you step off the bus, you are physically and verbally abused: countless pushups, endless hours at attention or running with heavy loads, while carefully trained professionals take turns screaming at you. This brutalization is designed to break down your existing mores and norms and to accept a new set of values that embrace destruction, violence and death as a way of life. In the end, you are desensitized to violence and accept it as a normal and essential survival skill in your brutal new world.

Something very similar to this desensitization toward violence is happening to our children through violence in the media – but instead of 18-year-olds, it begins at the age of 18 months when a child is first able to discern what is happening on television. Even though young children have some understanding of what it means to pretend, they are developmentally unable to distinguish clearly between fantasy and reality.

When young children see somebody shot, stabbed, raped, brutalized, degraded, or murdered on TV, to them it is as though it were actually happening. To have a child of three, four or five watch a "splatter" movie, learning to relate to a character for the first 90 minutes and then in the last 30 minutes watch helplessly as that new friend is hunted and brutally murdered, is the moral and psychological equivalent of introducing your child to a friend, letting her play with that friend, and then butchering that friend in front of your child's eyes. Regrettably, this happens to our children hundreds upon hundreds of times.

Lt. Col. Grossman shows that the Japanese were masters at using classical conditioning with their soldiers. Early in World War II, Chinese prisoners were placed in a ditch on their knees with their hands bound behind them. One by one, a select few Japanese soldiers would go into the ditch and bayonet "their" prisoner to death. Up on the bank, countless other young soldiers would cheer them on in their violence. Comparatively few soldiers actually killed in these situations, but by making the others watch and cheer, the Japanese were able to use these kinds of atrocities to classically condition a very large audience to associate pleasure with human death and suffering. Immediately afterwards, the soldiers who had been spectators were treated to sake, the best meal they had had in months, and to so-called comfort girls. The result? They learned to associate committing violent acts with pleasure.

Operant conditioning teaches you to kill, but classical conditioning is a subtle but powerful mechanism that teaches you to like it.

As Lt. Col. Grossman shows, our children watch vivid pictures of human suffering and death, and they learn to associate it with their favorite soft drink and candy bar, or their girlfriend's perfume.

Lt. Col. Grossman states that the third method the military uses is operant conditioning, a very powerful procedure of stimulus-response, stimulus-response. A benign example is the use of flight simulators to train pilots. An airline pilot in training sits in front of a flight simulator for endless hours; when a particular warning light goes on, he is taught to react in a certain way. When another warning light goes on, a different reaction is required. Stimulus-response, stimulus-response, stimulus-response. One day the pilot is actually flying a jumbo jet; the plane is going down, and 300 people are screaming behind him. He is scared out of his wits; but he does the right thing. Why? Because he has been conditioned to respond reflexively to this particular crisis.

The military and law enforcement community have made killing a conditioned response. Whereas infantry training in World War II used bull's-eye targets, now soldiers learn to fire at realistic, man-shaped silhouettes that pop into their field of view. That is the stimulus. The trainees have only a split second to engage the target. The conditioned response is to shoot the target, and then it drops. Stimulus-response, stimulus-response, stimulus-response – soldiers or police officers experience hundreds of repetitions. Later, when soldiers are on the battlefield or a police officer is walking a beat and somebody pops up with a gun, they will shoot reflexively and shoot to kill. 75 to 80 percent of the shooting on the modern battlefield is the result of this kind of stimulus-response training.

Now, if you're a little troubled by that, how much more should we be troubled by the fact that every time a child plays an interactive point-and-shoot video game, he is learning the exact same conditioned reflex and motor skills.

Lt. Col. Grossman says that he was an expert witness in a murder case in South Carolina offering mitigation for a boy who was facing the death penalty. He tried to explain to the jury that interactive video games had conditioned him to shoot a gun to kill. He had spent hundreds of dollars on video games learning to point and shoot, point and shoot. One day he and his buddy decided it would be fun to rob the local convenience store. They entered, and he pointed a snub-nosed .38 pistol at the clerk's head. The clerk turned to look at him, and the defendant shot reflexively from about six feet. The bullet hit the clerk right between the eyes - which is a pretty remarkable shot with that weapon at that range – and killed this father of two.

Afterward, Lt. Col. Grossman asked the boy what happened and why he did it. It clearly was not part of the plan to kill the guy – it was being videotaped from six different directions. He said, “I don't know. It was a mistake. It wasn't supposed to happen.”

One of the boys allegedly involved in the Jonesboro shootings (and they are just boys) had a fair amount of experience shooting real guns. The other one was a non-shooter and, to the best of our knowledge, had almost no experience shooting. Between them, those two boys fired 27 shots from a range of over 100 yards, and they hit 15 people. That's pretty remarkable shooting.

Lt. Col. Grossman says that he runs into these situations often – kids who have never picked up a gun in their lives pick up a real gun and are incredibly accurate. Why? Video games.

Lt. Col. Grossman notes that in the military, you are immediately confronted with a role model: your drill sergeant. He personifies violence and aggression. Along with military heroes, these violent role models have always been used to influence young, impressionable minds.

Today, the media are providing our children with role models, and this can be seen not just in the lawless sociopaths in movies and TV shows, but it can also be seen in the media-inspired, copycat aspects of the Jonesboro murders. This is the part of these juvenile crimes that the TV networks would much rather not report.

When the pictures of teenage killers appear on TV, somewhere there is a potentially violent little boy who says to himself, “Well, I'll show all those people who have been mean to me. I know how to get my picture on TV too.”

Thus, Lt. Col. Grossman notes we get copycat, cluster murders that work their way across America like a virus spread by the six o'clock news. No matter what someone has done, if you put his picture on TV, you have made him a celebrity, and someone, somewhere, will emulate him.

The lineage of the Jonesboro shootings began at Pearl, Mississippi, fewer than six months before. In Pearl, a 16-year-old boy was accused of killing his mother and then going to his school and shooting nine students, two of whom died, including his ex-girlfriend. Two months later, this virus spread to Paducah, Kentucky, where a 14-year-old boy was arrested for killing three students and wounding five others.

A very important step in the spread of this copycat crime virus occurred in Stamps, Arkansas, 15 days after Pearl and just a little over 90 days before Jonesboro. In Stamps, a 14-year-old boy, who was angry with his schoolmates, hid in the woods and fired at children as they came out of school. Sound familiar? Only two children were injured in this crime, so most of the world didn't hear about it; but it got great regional coverage on TV, and two little boys in Jonesboro, Arkansas, probably did hear about it.

Is this a reasonable price to pay for the TV networks' “right” to turn juvenile defendants into celebrities and role models by playing up their pictures on TV?

The third part of media wisdom is understanding the grammar of the media so that you can deconstruct and critique what you are watching by asking the right questions. Children spend the first 14 years of their lives learning grammar with respect to 16th Century technology - the written word. They need to be taught the grammar of 21st Century technology. Thus, they need to know how aspects of different media work and influence them, who controls the entertainment media and how, and how to be able to ask the right questions of what they watch, such as, Who is the hero? the villain? And, what is the premise?

Contrary to common sense and the weight of evidence, for many years people in the audience accepted the fallacy that the media did not influence their behavior.  These people failed to make wise choices in their media consumption and, consequently, contributed to the support of degrading, unwholesome and often immoral media.

Of course, many of them wanted to believe the media myth because they lusted after the illicit, the emotive and the evocative much like media addicted children who argue the media don’t influence them while begging and whining for the latest trendy, media-hyped product or article of clothing.

Most people no longer believe the false disclaimers of the media spokespersons and now think the biggest problem facing our society is a breakdown of morality, which they attribute to the negative influence of the mass media.

After years of denial, even 87% of the top media executives now admit that the violence in the mass media contribute to the violence in society.[1]  And children, too, are aware of the ability of the entertainment media to influence their behavior.[2]

People throughout the world have a particular distrust and disdain for the negative influence of the explicit entertainment being produced by Hollywood.

While such awareness is important, awareness alone is not the answer to the problem.  It is, of course, the first step toward the answer.

The answer is to go beyond complaining.  People must be helped to develop the media awareness and discernment skills to use the entertainment media without being abused by it.

The fourth part of media wisdom, your children need to understand their Christian values so they can be able to use those values to evaluate the answers they get from asking the right questions. If the hero wins by murdering and mutilating, your children need to understand why this is bad, no matter how likeable the hero seems to be on the surface.

Parents have an easier time than teachers with number four, because they can apply their deeply held beliefs to evaluate the media. Even so, media literacy and values education are two of the fastest growing areas in the academic community, because educators realize that something is amiss. Therefore, I speak all around the world at national education associations and present my deeply held Christian beliefs as the yardstick that I use to evaluate the ascertainment questions needing to be asked.

Yale scholar Harold Bloom analyzes the emergence of a post-Christian America in his book, THE AMERICAN RELIGION, and says that the god we worship is ourselves.  He says the real religion of America is Gnosticism, an elitist heresy that combines mystical Greek and oriental philosophies and claims that a person needed special knowledge to get to the highest heaven.  Christianity posits that you need no special knowledge because Jesus Christ offers salvation to all who believe in Him by faith, which is a gift from God.

Considering the plethora of worldviews presented in the mass media, it is important to have a basic knowledge of them and how they differ. The more you understand these worldviews and how they differ, the better your discernment in all areas of life, including the mass media.

To understand the worldview of a movie, you must discern its doctrine of reality, doctrine of creation, doctrine of man, doctrine of salvation, doctrine of knowledge, and the other 20 critical components of a biblical Christian worldview.

Then, the child must ask the right questions to discern the basic components of the movie or other media product and compare the answers to the plumb line of your biblical standards.

The final aspect of media wisdom is to understand how to redeem the values of the mass media of entertainment. The Christian Film & Television Commission™ ministry has had great success in this regard as noted earlier.

In 1983, after serving as president of the organization that produced the Emmy Award winning C.S. Lewis CHRONICLES OF NARNIA: THE LION, THE WITCH AND THE WARDROBE for CBS TV and after funding five feature films, I met George Heimrich, director of the Protestant Film Office in the 1950s and 1960s. Inspired by the ministry of the Protestant Film Office, I reinstated that important work by establishing the Christian Film & Television Commission™ as the only Christian advocacy group in Hollywood listed with the guilds. Mr. Heimrich donated his Protestant Film Office files to the Christian Film & Television Commission™ where they now reside. Since then, the Christian Film & Television Commission™ has served as a liaison, working with studio executives in understanding the needs and concerns of the general public for wholesome, family entertainment.

The Christian Film & Television Commission™ is a ministry dedicated to redeeming the values of the mass media according to biblical principles:

  • by influencing media executives to adopt higher standards imbued with Christian and traditional family values, and

  • by informing and equipping moral people in America and around the world, especially parents, families and Christians, to make wise media choices based on the biblical worldview.

In 1985, after understanding that the most important person in Hollywood is the teenager who buys most tickets at the box office, I began publishing MOVIEGUIDE®, a monthly family guide to movies and entertainment magazine which reviews all movies from a Christian perspective. MOVIEGUIDE® helps parents know before their children go. It is the most reliable guide to moviegoers in helping them choose the good and reject the bad. MOVIEGUIDE®’s very accurate content ratings note not only sex, violence and profanity, but also worldview, theology, philosophy, and other important criteria.

Also starting in 1985, I began teaching parents and Christian leaders how to teach children how to discern between good and bad entertainment and how to build in them the desire to choose the good. This training led eventually to his THE MEDIA-WISE FAMILY™ book, video series and audiotapes.

For these seminars, I draw upon years of theological training (I am on the Steering Committee of the Theological Summit Conference) and my research into cognitive development theory and the influence of the mass media of entertainment during his tenure during the late 1970s as the Director of the TV Center at City University of New York, one of the top three television departments in the United States. As the director of the TV Center, I did important research into the influence of the mass media of entertainment for a Temple University program on the mass media of entertainment, sponsored by the Annenberg Institute, and incorporated into the research the National Institute of Mental Health’s studies in the late 1970s on the mass media’s influence.

From the detailed information that MOVIEGUIDE® is unique in gathering, I also started my “Report to the Entertainment Industry,” an insightful box office analysis of the vast moral American audience. Information on negative or positive content, Biblical or anti-Biblical themes, increase or decrease of sex or violence, and over 20 other indicators is carefully tabulated and compared with box-office receipts for several years. Based on this empirical data, I have been able to prove to Hollywood executives that America’s public prefers wholesome, worthwhile, moral movies, and it would benefit these executives to support the production of more good movies.

Along with the yearly “Report to the Entertainment Industry,” I select the ten best family friendly and the ten best morally edifying mature audience films of the year and awards the producers, directors, writers, and distribution companies associated with these movies plaques of recognition at an annual awards ceremony in Hollywood. I also present the coveted $25,000 Epiphany Prizes for the Most Inspiring Movies and Television Programs. These are cash prizes granted to movies and television programs which help people to know and understand God and His love.

Now armed with more than 50 years of statistical information, 20 years of research and support from leaders in the entertainment industry, I am doing more than watching the world change – I am using the media to change the media. The most important part of this missionary work is, of course, promoting the Gospel of Jesus Christ in a unique way that satisfies the real spiritual needs of all people.

Although there are several Christian fellowship and evangelism groups, the Christian Film & Television Commission is the only Christian advocacy group in the entertainment industry out of over 300 advocacy groups in the entertainment industry. As an advocacy group with a missionary focus, we work with the major entertainment companies to help them understand the concerns of the 135 to 165 million Americans who go to church every week.

As an example of the advocacy work of The Christian Film & Television Commission, Jeffrey Katzenberg of DreamWorks contacted me to recruit the top Christian theologians to work on the development of the God-centered production of the groundbreaking animated movie, THE PRINCE OF EGYPT. These theologians contributed to the moral and theological excellence of that production.

Each year around Oscar time, MOVIEGUIDE® hosts the Annual MOVIEGUIDE® Awards Gala and Report to the Entertainment Industry in Hollywood, where it rewards the best worthwhile movies and TV programs of the previous year. At the gala event, I present a statistical analysis based on the magazine’s reviews, the Annual Report to the Entertainment Industry. This analysis consistently shows that worthwhile movies with moral, biblical or even pro-Christian stories, themes, sounds, and images usually make far more money at the box office on average than movies with excessive violence, foul language, nudity, explicit sex, and other content that strongly violates traditional family values and traditional Christian teachings.

Thus, the mass media of entertainment needs to do much more to reach the traditional church-going family audience if it wants to increase its profits. The entertainment industry can do this by making more worthwhile movies with traditional biblical values and traditional biblical creeds and learning how to market them better. Christian Film & Television Commission™ ministry and MOVIEGUIDE®’s staff and supporters want to help industry leaders do just that, not only by analyzing trends and handing out awards but also by consulting with filmmakers, industry leaders and publicists on various projects.

The Commission also sponsors the very important MEDIA-WISE FAMILY seminars to help families teach their children to be media-wise, in a God-centered and Christocentric way, informed by the biblical worldview based on God’s Word. I have spoken to countless groups, including family groups and church-based groups, in America, Europe and Asia about developing media wisdom for them and their families, children, friends, and colleagues. Among the many academic institutions where I have presented MEDIA-WISE FAMILY lectures are Dartmouth College, the University of Virginia, UCLA, and the University of Sheffield in the U.K.

Measuring Success in this Mission Field

The ultimate measure of success is the changed hearts and minds of the Hollywood decision makers. Thus, the production of more acceptable movies is a measure of success. In this regard, when we started Christian Film & Television Commission™ (1978)/MOVIEGUIDE® in 1985, there was only one movie with positive Christian content; last year, there were 116 or 42 percent of the movies released. When we started there were only six movies aimed at families; last year, there were over 40 percent. When we started, more than 80 percent of the movies were R-rated; now, less than 45 percent are R-rated each year. Furthermore, in recent years, 80 to 90 percent of the Top Five to Ten Movies at the Box Office have been either family movies with traditional moral values or movies with strong, positive Christian content and worldviews, like FINDING NEMO or THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST. The chairman of a major movie studio recently told me at lunch that he attributed these shifts directly to our influence and our economic benchmarking of the entertainment industry.

There are important demographic reasons for this shift, especially the impact of the 77 million Generation Y-ers on the box office. The Christian Film & Television Commission™ and its publication, MOVIEGUIDE®, led the entertainment industry by showing them the direction this generational demographic shift was going many months and sometimes years before it was reported in the entertainment industry journals and the Los Angeles Times.

In this regard, it is very important to help the most powerful person in the entertainment industry, the consumer, choose the good and reject the bad,  thus affecting the box office. This can be done by having more people reached with the MOVIEGUIDE® and THE MEDIA-WISE FAMILY message, and more press, more television coverage contribute to this goal.

The Annual MOVIEGUIDE® Awards Gala and Report to the Entertainment Industry is targeted at the top entertainment industry leaders who can green light (approve) movies and television programs and thus imprint their interpretation of morality and spirituality onto the whole of global society; and, at the millions of movie consumers who need to be encouraged to be media-wise so that they can support the good and reject bad entertainment. Through our broadcast of the Awards Gala on TV, the event will also reach millions of entertainment consumers, who can also influence Hollywood by changing the way consumers vote at the box office.

By bringing together the top entertainment decision-makers to receive their prizes and awards, this annual event provides an effective forum for my Report to the Entertainment Industry, which graphically presents the economic benefits of adhering to worthwhile moral and spiritual principles. The Report to the Entertainment Industry shows these entertainment leaders that someone is watching, counting and analyzing their work. In the process, it shows that concerned people are intelligent consumers and not merely passive fodder for the entertainment publicity mill. The report presents carefully researched statistics which dispel the myths that sex and violence sells . . . and shows that worthwhile, redemptive movies prosper. This report has inspired many of these media decision-makers to change their values and improve the products they produce.

Thus, one can also measure the success of the Annual MOVIEGUIDE® Awards Gala and Report to the Entertainment Industry by the Hollywood executives and talent who attend the event, including their testimonials. Establishing personal relationships with these decision makers is crucial if we are to have a positive influence on the mass media of entertainment. This is an ongoing process, however, which takes years of continued effort to achieve higher and higher levels of success.

Attracting major stars to both give awards and to accept awards is an important part of measuring the success of each Awards Gala, because they can give us a higher level of visibility in Hollywood, in the news media and in society at-large. Such higher visibility also can help us promote our missionary outreach. Therefore, another way to measure success is by the amount of press clippings we receive from both the secular media and the Christian media for each Annual MOVIEGUIDE® Awards Gala and Report to the Entertainment Industry and the ongoing work of the ministry.

Next, one can measure success by the number of TV networks and stations which pick up our annual broadcast version of the Awards Gala. The timeslots in which the program airs air are just as important, if not more so. Such high exposure helps us solicit subscriptions for MOVIEGUIDE®, as well as generate interest in my Annual Report to the Entertainment Industry and in my MEDIA-WISE FAMILY seminars. Consequently, our success is also measured by the number of requests we receive for these items, not only from the entertainment industry but from consumers, including parents and families, as well.

Finally, we measure our success by whether we accomplish our goal of witnessing to Hollywood, and the world, about the power of the Gospel of Jesus Christ and the wonder of His Grace, Mercy and Love. Thus, Christian faith, energized by God’s Love, must be the central focus of everything we do. If we succeed in expressing that faith, then God spiritually will bless us a million fold.

These charts will help you understand our two-pronged strategy:  (Show charts)  (Show videos)

Recently, Variety, the premier trade publication for the entertainment industry, noted that the Christian Film & Television Commission™ is the leading Christian group trying to improve the moral content of movies. We welcome your support in helping us to redeem the values of the entertainment industry, so that we can transform our culture with the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

If we had time, I would show you a video of a little first grader in Texas. When we were producing our MEDIA-WISE FAMILY™ DVD, we videotaped a first grade classroom in a very conservative Christian school. I asked the first graders how many had seen the most violent movie of the year at that time: SCREAM. Almost half of the children rasied their hands. The prodcuer said that these little children could not have seen it, so I asked if anyone would tell me thestory. One little boy told the class about all the sex and violence in the movie. I asked him if he liked sex and violence and he said, "Yes." The teacher was in ttears. She said that she had ask the father not to take the boy to violent movie, btut eh father said that she should not tell him how to raise his son.

Therefore, we must clean up the mass media of entertainment for the benefit of our children and grandchildren and the health of our families.

Hallmark Cards in the USA used to have a saying, "For those you care enough to give the very best."

What is the key word there?

Do you care enough to learn how to teach your children and grandchildren how to be media wise?

If so, we can redeem the values of the mass media of entertainment to affirm and defend the natural family.


[1] According to a 1994 UCLA Center for Communication Policy/U.S. NEWS AND WORLD REPORT survey mailed to 6,300 decision-makers in the entertainment industry, receiving a 13.76% response.

[2] See chapter 2.

 

 

 

 

 

Conveners | Declaration | Program | Speakers | SwanSearch Speeches | Presidential Letter | Congressional Letter | Photos

 

 

Copyright © 1997-2012 The Howard Center: Permission granted for unlimited use. Credit required. |  contact: webmaster