Home | Purpose WCF6 WCF5 WCF4 | WCF3 | WCF2 | WCF1 | Regional | People | Family Update | Newsletter | Press | Search | DONATE | THC 

 

 

Send  |

  Conveners | Background | Declaration | A CALL | Survey | Program | Speakers | SwanSearch Speeches | Youth | Children | Photos

 

 

 

 

Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Findings on the Role 
of the Biological Mother in Human Survival and Development

 

 

Mohammadreza Hojat, Ph.D.

  BIO

Remarks to The World Congress of Families II

 "The key to the Heaven is under mother's foot steps"  -A Persian proverb

SUMMARY

The purpose of this presentation is to provide theoretical and empirical evidence in support of the following proposition:

"A bio-psycho-social paradigm of parenthood suggests that the nature has provided the biological mother with the essential endowment to become the most adequate caregiver for physical, emotional, and social well-being of her own offspring."

Support for this proposition is provided by presenting theoretical and empirical evidence from the following six areas of scientific knowledge:  Evolutionary theory of differential parental investment, unique advantage of maternal lactation, sex differences in hormones, the newborn's preference for the mother's voice, the internal and personal experiences of pregnancy, and bio-psycho-social factors that promote mother-child attachment.

A BRIEF DESCRIPTION

1. Parental Investment:  Based on the life history of the human race, scholars of "evolutionary psychology" proposed that men and women differ in their reproductive strategies, and women more often than men make a greater "parental investment" (defined as any effort to increase the survival chance of one's own offspring.)  The ultimate purpose of such investment is an evolutionary-based tendency to preserve one's own genes (DNAs) for passing them to the next generation (Trivers, 1972).  There are two reasons in support of the contention that the mother is more likely than the father to make more parental investment.  First, women have always been more certain about their maternity than men about their paternity.  The higher maternal certainty emerges from the fact that women conceive internally, and their pregnancy leaves no doubt about their maternity.  In contrast, men cannot be as certain as women about their paternity because ovulation is concealed to them (in modern times, DNA testing can make an exception).  Second, under normal conditions, women produce fewer gametes (normally one egg a month during their child bearing period) than men (millions of sperms a day during their active sexual life.)  This sex difference in gamete production makes the woman's reproductive success (defined as maximizing the number of one's own genes that one can pass to the next generation) more scarce and therefore more valuable, hence prompting women to invest more in their scarce resources (Buss & Schmitt, 1993).

2. Lactation and Breast-Feeding:  The marked hormonal changes of the early postnatal period result in maternal lactation.  Breast-feeding, the manifestation of maternal lactation, represents the very essence of maternal behavior.  Research with nonhuman mammals suggests that the prolactin hormone produced during breast-feeding contributes significantly to maternal behavior.  Breast-feeding provides a unique opportunity in which not only the biological needs of the infant can be satisfied, but it also offers favorable moments for physical closeness and psychological intimacy (Leifer, 1980).  Evidence suggest that touching, holding, cuddling, stroking, verbal communication, and thermoregulation (that are beneficial to the infant's neurological and psychological development) are likely to occur during the enface holding of the infant at the time of breast-feeding (Klaus & Kennell, 1992).  Nature has given this unique opportunity to the mother only.

3. Sex Hormones:  Men and women differ from one another not only by their obvious physical attributes and reproductive functions, but also by secretion of differing sex hormones.  New mothers undergo large shifts in hormonal state and other neurochemicals, characterized by changes in progestrone, estrogen, testostrone, prolactin, cortisol level, norepinephrine, oxitocin, and the opioid rewarding system (Flemming, Corter, & Steiner, 1995).  Sex hormones not only influence the maternal behavior, but also contribute to the development of gender specific behavior of the fetus.  From the time of inception in the mother's womb, sex hormones start to set a different system of behavioral tendencies in motion that can lead to differently wired brains in girls and boys (Kimura, 1992).  These sex differences in hormonal secretion, and other biochemicals early in life produce a sex specific behavioral repertoire that, under normal circumstances, is likely to follow the individual like a shadow from cradle to grave.  The maternal system in the female species can be linked to these biological facts.  It is therefore mostly biology that shapes the destiny.

4. Infant's Preference for the Mother's Voice:  Research findings indicate that sounds can be transmitted into the uterus, and the fetus is capable of responding to such auditory stimulation.  The maternal voice is the most intense acoustical signal in the amniotic environment of the uterus.  Therefore, prenatal experiences with the maternal voice predispose the newborn to develop a differential sensitivity and a preferential orientation to the mother's voice.  Examination of the infant's sucking bursts and patterns revealed that two-days old newborns prefer their mother's voice over any other human voice and over silence (Fifer & Moon, 1995).  It is therefore obvious that no other individual except the biological mother can enjoy this preferential advantage.

5. Experience of Pregnancy:  Pregnancy has been described as a process of maturation for women (Liefer, 1980).  The physiological changes that occur during pregnancy, and are naturally experienced by the pregnant women, combined with cognitive and psychological factors that are associated with pregnancy, generate a condition that is unique and personal to the expectant mother.  The fertilization, gestation, and placentation are all internal within the mother who feels that a life is being gradually developed within her own body.  For example, kicking of the growing fetus becomes only detectable by the mother as a mild tickling at first, prompting the mother to feel that something is coming to life inside her body.  This feeling can be the beginning of bonding to her tiny, emergent baby (Konner, 1991).  Fathers cannot enjoy this ecstasy, and this early form of bonding until a later time.  Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that the uterine environment, nutrition, physical activities and mental status of the pregnant woman can directly and profoundly influence the neurological and other organ development of the growing fetus in the womb.  Fathers have no direct input in these developmental processes at this stage.

6. Mother-Child Attachment:  Bonding between a child and the mother is described as "unique without parallel, established unalterably for a whole lifetime as the first and strongest love-object and as the prototype of all love relationships-for both sexes" (Freud, 1940, P. 188).  Evidence suggests that there is a window of opportunity shortly after birth that appears to be optimal for the formation of a strong affectional bond between the mother and her child.  It has been suggested that during this intense emotional period, skin-to-skin contact between the mother and her newborn will help to develop a stronger mother-child attachment with measurable behavioral consequences (Klaus & Kennell, 1992).  The phenomenon of mother-child attachment is best conceived as the outcome of "a number of instinctual response systems, mostly nonoral in character, which are part of the inherited behavioral repertoire of man" (Bowlby, 1960, p. 9).  Studies by Harlow and his colleagues suggest that satisfaction of biological needs is irrelevant to the psychosocial development of the young (Harlow & Mears, 1979).  The quality of attachment between a mother and her child, according to the attachment scholars, can lead to the development of "internal working models" that lay the foundation of adults' personality and interpersonal relationships (Bowlby, 1969/1982; Ainsworth, 1985).  The individual's views of self, others and the word as friendly or hostile are among the outcomes of such internal working models. 

Concluding Remarks

The aforementioned theoretical formulations and empirical findings suggest that nature has provided the biological mother with the essential endowment to become the most suitable caregiver to her own offspring.  The mother's potential influences on the physical, psychological, and social development of her offspring suggest that there is a kernel of truth in the popular saying that "The hand that rocks the cradle, is the hand that rules the world."

I must also emphasize that the mother's "goodness of fit" should not be taken, at all, as an argument against the involvement of the father in caring of his own children.  Evidence indeed suggests that it is to the best interest of the child that both the mother and the father be in full support of one another and share the appropriate child care responsibilities for a healthy psychosocial development of the child (Lamb, 1981).

Finally, it must be added that some prevailing social trends in technologically advanced societies appear to prevent the infants and toddlers from enjoying their birth-right to be cared for by their own biological parents in a natural family environment.  The unleashed liberalism of the Western kind, the extreme feminist groups, and advocates of "redefining" the marriage, and "reconstructing" the family provide the fuel to the fire to achieve their wishful goal to celebrate on the burned graveyard of fundamental social institutions of marriage, the family, and parenthood.  Medical, behavioral, and social scholars, as well as the state and spiritual authorities who have taken the head-in-the-sand approach, by using defense mechanisms of denial, rationalization and projection are all participants of the 'conspiracy of silence."  Those bystanders who look the other way, and those silent observers who deliberately choose not to be part of the solution, are themselves part of the problem.  Silence will fuel the flames.

 

 

 

 

 

  Conveners | Background | Declaration | A CALL | Survey | Program | Speakers | SwanSearch Speeches | Youth | Children | Photos

 

 

Copyright © 1997-2012 The Howard Center: Permission granted for unlimited use. Credit required. |  contact: webmaster